How to improve your quality of life? Advice from leading epidemiologist. 6

How to improve your quality of life? Advice from leading epidemiologist. 6

Can we help?

Leading expert in epidemiology and social determinants of health, Dr. George Kaplan, MD, explains how individuals and communities can improve quality of life by addressing health behaviors and public policy. He details the dramatic success of anti-smoking initiatives, using the United States as a primary example where smoking rates dropped from 50-60% to 17%, and discusses the ongoing global challenges, particularly in countries like China where economic incentives conflict with public health goals.

Improving Population Health: Strategies from Individual Action to Policy Change

Jump To Section

Individual Health Responsibility

Dr. George Kaplan, MD, emphasizes that individuals must take proactive steps to improve their health and quality of life. This foundational approach includes seeking out nutritious food, avoiding smoking, and consuming alcohol only in moderation. Dr. George Kaplan, MD, notes that these personal choices form the first line of defense against chronic disease and are critical for anyone, regardless of their background or country of origin.

Social Connections and Institutional Impact

Beyond individual action, Dr. George Kaplan, MD, highlights the profound impact of social connections and relationships with powerful institutions on a person's life. He acknowledges the difficulty for those without power to influence these institutions but argues that intervention at this level is crucial. The epidemiologist explains that community bonds and access to supportive systems are key social determinants that significantly shape long-term health outcomes.

Local Anti-Smoking Initiatives and National Impact

A powerful example of successful public health intervention comes from local anti-smoking policies. Dr. George Kaplan, MD, cites the town of Brookline, Massachusetts, which in 1994 became one of the first municipalities to forbid smoking in public areas. This local action, as Dr. Kaplan describes to Dr. Anton Titov, MD, created a visible change in community behavior and served as a catalyst that grew into a broader national movement against smoking.

Alameda County Study Data on Smoking Reduction

The dramatic success of these public health efforts is quantified by the Alameda County Study, which Dr. George Kaplan, MD, references. This long-term research, beginning in 1965, tracked smoking rates in California. The data shows an extraordinary decline from 50-60% of men smoking to a modern rate of approximately 17%. Dr. Kaplan points out that this cultural shift is so complete that smoking is now viewed negatively even among high school and junior high school students.

While wealthy nations have made significant progress, Dr. George Kaplan, MD, notes that global smoking trends reveal stark disparities. During his discussion with Dr. Anton Titov, MD, he contrasts the success in countries like the US, UK, and Sweden with the ongoing challenges in other regions. Smoking rates are declining worldwide but not nearly as steeply or quickly in emerging markets and Eastern Europe, indicating an uneven public health victory.

Economic Barriers to Public Health Progress

A major barrier to global health improvement is economic incentive structures that conflict with public health goals. Dr. George Kaplan, MD, provides a striking example from his research into smoking in China a decade ago, where he discovered that 17% of the nation's tax revenues were derived from tobacco sales. This created a situation where the state had a direct financial investment in its citizens smoking, presenting a fundamental conflict for health policymakers.

Future Public Health Goals and Challenges

The conversation between Dr. Anton Titov, MD and Dr. George Kaplan, MD, concludes with a forward-looking perspective on public health. The epidemiologist expresses optimism about being "on the road towards eliminating smoking-related diseases" in relatively wealthy countries, representing one of modern public health's greatest successes. However, Dr. Kaplan acknowledges that smoking remains a significant global problem, requiring continued effort at both individual and policy levels to achieve health equity worldwide.

Full Transcript

Dr. Anton Titov, MD: Sometimes someone watches this interview and comes from a less privileged background, maybe from a less privileged, less rich country. What can they do to better their lot in modern society, at least as far as their health is concerned?

Dr. George Kaplan, MD: Certainly, everyone has to take some responsibility at the individual level for what they do. They have to seek out good food. They have to avoid smoking. They have to drink only moderately, etc.

But they also have to see that the connections they have with others and their connections to institutions have an impact on their lives, and where possible, try to intervene on that.

That'll be difficult if there are people without power. It is difficult for them to control powerful institutions. But I believe, in the case of smoking in many countries, it is a good example where local efforts have grown into a more national effort in terms of anti-smoking policies.

When they just came to the United States in 1994, there was a town of Brookline, Massachusetts, part of the Boston area, that was one of the first towns to forbid smoking in public areas. I remember coming from Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Boston. There are significantly fewer people smoking outside of the clubs, or certainly inside.

That probably is an example of a local intervention that grew out through the national level. These changes are enormous. In the Alameda County Study, which I corrected for many years that started in 1965, about 50 to 60% of the men smoked in California then.

Now in 2014, it is probably more like 17%. If you go into high school or junior high school now, smoking is not viewed positively by kids. We are on the road towards eliminating smoking-related diseases, at least in relatively wealthy countries.

It is still a big problem. About ten years ago, I was looking at the problem of smoking in China. The rates among men in China are very high. I discovered at that time that 17% of the tax revenues in China were derived from tobacco sales. The state had an investment in people smoking. This then, of course, was not healthy for them.

Dr. Anton Titov, MD: Is that situation trending towards the better in China, Eastern Europe, and other emerging markets?

Dr. George Kaplan, MD: Smoking rates are going down worldwide, but not nearly as steeply or quickly as they've gone down in the US, UK, Sweden, Nordic countries, etc.